• <a fr-original-style="" href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/us-court-throws-out-big-damages-award-against-cisco-2022-06-23/" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color: rgb(9, 9, 9); text-decoration: none; background-color: transparent; outline: none; cursor: pointer; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s; touch-action: manipulation; user-select: auto; box-sizing: border-box;" target="_blank">A US appeals court</a> threw out a more than $2.75 billion (€2.6bn) award against Cisco, stating the trial judge should have recused himself from the case after learning that his wife owned Cisco stock. The 3-0 decision by the appeals court was also a defeat for Centripetal Networks, which had sued Cisco for allegedly copying five cybersecurity patents.<ul fr-original-style="padding-inline-start: 20px;" style="padding-inline-start: 20px; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; list-style-position: inside; box-sizing: border-box;"><li fr-original-style="" style="box-sizing: border-box;">What happened: US District Judge Henry Morgan had found Cisco liable for patent infringement in October 2020, two months after learning that his wife owned 100 Cisco shares worth $4,688. The Due Process clauses of the US Constitution require judges to recuse themselves from cases where the judge has a financial interest in the case's outcome.</li></ul>

patent infringement ile ilgili hikayeler